A hint on the ruthless nature of this predatory system promoted by the gambling politicians of democracy; the same politicians that have undoubtedly succeeded in provoking an unpredictable catastrophe, for the sake of a corporatocrat system with an artificial superiority complex, sustained by the gambling, lobbying and bullying of a self-interested minority elite.
Capitalism is the immoral distribution of capital, a corporatocrat tyranny.
Corporatocracy, in social theories that focus on conflicts and opposing interests within society, denotes a system of government that serves the interest of, and may be run by, corporations and involves ties between government and business. Where corporations, conglomerates, and/or government entities with private components, control the direction and governance of a country, including carrying out economic planning (notwithstanding the “free market” label).
If you don’t understand what are the practical social results of Corporatocracy and unfair distribution of capital, or even go as far as not acknowledging that there is a huge social problem in your Democrat Capitalist country, because it simply does not affects you, you are probably rich, and part of the said 1% “elite” that control the country and does everything for themselves while drinking champagne and sticking a big middle finger at the other 99%; which are basically the skint wage slaves, the people being ripped off by the banks, the people suffering from lack of infrastructure, the unemployed, and the, plainly said, people in misery.
A country has to be run for the country’s own people (99%), not in the name of every self-interested, dubious needs and demands of corporations, institutions and the elite (1%).
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
The first policy of any given country should be to guarantee fair distribution of capital, as in guarantee basic services and lifestyle to all of its people, guarantee a fair level of education and completely ban unemployment, as in redefining its system and structure to meet the most basic needs of its own people.
Capitalism: “Miss another payment and we take the blanket.”
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.
Our nation’s founders declared their independence on July 4, 1776, to break free of the tyranny of a nation that denied them the civil liberties that they believed all people were granted as a birthright. They reaffirmed that faith in independence from governmental tyranny with the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. But Freedom cannot survive when those in power make exceptions to the First Amendment for speech they dislike or criticism they would rather not hear.
Occupy Wall Street is an ongoing demonstration opposing what participants view as negative corporate influence over U.S. politics and a lack of legal repercussions over the global financial crisis. It was inspired by the Arab Spring movement, particularly the protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square which resulted in the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. The aim of the demonstration is to begin a sustained occupation of Wall Street, the financial district of New York City, to draw attention to Wall Street’s misdeeds and call for structural economic reforms. Organizers intend for the occupation to last “as long as it takes to meet our demands.” Demands are in the process of being negotiated and developed. The protest was coordinated with similar though smaller events nationwide; as of September 27 the Occupy Wall Street site reported that “52 cities were occupied or organizing” including Boston, San Francisco, and Chicago, as coordinated on Occupytogether.org.
Occupy Wall Street, picture by Joshua Paul
Senator Bernie Sanders also spoke in the protests, with the main points of his speech against corporatocracy being,
Through our Fed audit we found that the Fed loaned $16 trillion to banks and financial institutions all around the world.
3 out of the 4 largest financial institutions are bigger today than before the financial crisis began.
Today, 1 in 4 credit card holders are paying interest rates of more than 20%. That is usury.
K. Skolnick also added,
I think the main thing we’re doing is knocking on the walls of ignorance in this country so people wake up.
Occupy Wall Street, picture by Joshua Paul
Corporatocracy, in social theories that focus on conflicts and opposing interests within society, denotes a system of government that serves the interest of, and may be run by, corporations and involves ties between government and business. Where corporations, conglomerates, and/or government entities with private components, control the direction and governance of a country, including carrying out economic planning (notwithstanding the “free market” label).
According to my own sources in the US, all of them say that the mainstream media (Judenpresse) is largely ignoring (censoring) the event, and people are being forced to resort to European media to learn what is happening in their own country, such as The Guardian UK.
Occupy Wall Street, picture by Adrianne Jeffries
Occupy Wall Street, picture by J.A. Myerson
Occupy Wall Street, picture by ZD Roberts
While watching numerous videos of the police beating up its own citizens in New York, I could not stop wondering that if it was not for the internet, the images would never have gone out in the media, and the United States government and media would still be lying blank faced to everybody, including their own citizens, that the United States is the land of freedom and opportunity.
While studying local (Central/Western European) history in detail recently, I read a copy (together with his complete biography, articles and speeches in its original language) of a 1939 speech from Paul Joseph Goebbels, “What does America really want ?”, and it stroke me that Goebbels managed to describe, with precision, America’s foreign policy and attitude as of today, in 1939.
Nothing has really changed.
In the extracts below, replace the references to Germany with Iran/Iraq and National Socialism with Islamism. As a matter of fact, you can simply replace the references to Germany and National Socialism with any foreign affair the United States appear involved within the last century, in present times, or in the near future.
The extracts below are taken from “Was will eigentlich Amerika,” Die Zeit ohne Beispiel (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP., 1941), pp. 24-30, in its English translation by Randall Bytwerk.
The American press takes particular pleasure in criticizing Germany on grounds of humanitarianism, civilization, human rights, and culture. It has every right to do so. Its humanity is shown by lynchings. Its civilization is shown in economic and political scandals that stink to high heaven. Its human rights are displayed by eleven or twelve million unemployed, who apparently chose to be so. And its culture exists only because it is always borrowing from the older European nations. Such a nation is certainly justified in sneering at ancient Europe, whose nations and peoples looked back on centuries, even millennia, of cultural achievements long before America was discovered.
The American press replies to our complaints by saying that it has nothing against Germany, only against National Socialism. That is a poor excuse. National Socialism today is Germany’s guiding political idea and worldview. The entire German nation affirms it. To criticize National Socialism today therefore means to criticize the entire German nation.
Generally, it does not make any difference to us. We Germans do not depend on the love or grace of other nations; we live from our own national strength. The time is long past when Germany expected its salvation from abroad. Such international help was always lacking when it was most needed during the postwar period. It appeared only when international money and stock capital believed that it could earn vast profits by helping Germany.
We could simply say that America is far away, with a big ocean separating us. What do we care about what they think, write, or say about us? That was quite OK as long as America’s highly developed hate campaign against Germany kept within certain bounds. But when it infects even official circles rather than merely newspapers and radio stations, it becomes more serious.
This campaign reached unbelievable heights after 10 November 1938. American public opinion, influenced by the Jews, is trying to interfere to an unacceptable degree in German domestic politics. They think that can use methods against Germany that are normally unheard of in relations between civilized nations.
We know very well who the instigators and beneficiaries are. They are mostly Jews, or people who are in their service and who are dependent on them.
For example, it is not surprising that the New York press attacks Germany so strongly. Over two million Jews live in New York, and economic life there is entirely under their control.
The German press so far has generally ignored this filthy campaign of hatred, or answered it only in a restrained manner. Only after official personages in the United States got involved did we think it necessary to say something. For example, the American Interior Secretary Ickes said on 19 December 1938 that no American could accept a medal from the hands of a brutal dictatorship. With the same hand, it robbed and tortured thousands of people, that it saw a day when it committed no new crime against humanity as a day wasted. Put simply, that is not a style of speaking that is customary in relations between states.
The American Assistant Secretary of State Wells responded to German protests by saying that Ickes’ statement represented the opinion of the overwhelming majority of the American public. One does not know what to say. What does he mean! Was the American president ever personally attacked in the German press, or America’s leading men slandered? We have been very restrained, even though we certainly had every reason to discuss this or that matter of American domestic policy.
Such things are not our concern. American statesmen, not us, determine American domestic policy. We are concerned only with Germany’s affairs. We also have no reason or intention of smuggling German political ideas into America. The very opposite, since the methods that we use are purely German. They are only valid in Germany. But we do believe that just as we respect the internal affairs of other countries and avoid polemics against them, they should treat us in the same way.
One cannot say that that is true of the United States of North America. Nearly the whole press, radio, and film industry support the worldwide campaign against Germany.
We happen to think that the American people have nothing to do with the matter. If they do not like Germany, it is because of the hate campaign. This campaign is conducted by certain international scoundrels who lack conscience and scruples. They are doing it both for foreign and domestic reasons.
We have no intention of answering the criticisms that the American Jewish press raises against Germany by looking at America’s domestic affairs. It is enough to observe that although Germany is the poorest country in the world in terms of foreign currency reserves and raw materials, it has not only abolished unemployment, but has a labor shortage. North America, meanwhile has between eleven and twelve million unemployed, even though it is rich in foreign currency reserves and raw materials. Most of the American press ignores this situation. It cannot deny it, of course.
The German people sees things differently. It knows that certain restrictions in some areas were necessary for national reconstruction. The American public is practically drowning in wealth, prosperity, foreign currency, gold bars, and raw materials. It can hardly imagine how an intelligent, hardworking, and courageous people can get along without all those advantages.
No one but Germany has the right to judge Germany’s domestic affairs. No one has the right to turn one people against another, to incite discord and promote ignorance that lead to international crises.
In the replace the references example above (Germany for Iraq/Iran, or any foreign affair the United States appear involved within the last century, in present times, or in the near future), who is/was geographically located in the borders of and in direct threat and conflict with the Iraqis and the Iranians ?
Prior to the invasion, the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom asserted that the possibility of Iraq employing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threatened their security and that of their coalition/regional allies.
Following the invasion, the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its nuclear, chemical, and biological programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion.
The invasion of Iraq led to an occupation and the eventual capture of President Saddam, who was later tried in an Iraqi court of law and executed by the new Iraqi government.
In 2007, Iraq was second on the Failed States Index.
By March 2008, violence in Iraq was reported curtailed by 40–80%, according to a Pentagon report. Independent reports raised questions about those assessments. An Iraqi military spokesman claimed that civilian deaths since the start of the troop surge plan were 265 in Baghdad, down from 1,440 in the four previous weeks. The New York Times counted more than 450 Iraqi civilians killed during the same 28-day period, based on initial daily reports from Iraqi Interior Ministry and hospital officials.
Historically, the daily counts tallied by the New York Times have underestimated the total death toll by 50% or more when compared to studies by the United Nations, which rely upon figures from the Iraqi Health Ministry and morgue figures.
Coalition forces also began to target alleged Iranian Quds force operatives in Iraq, either arresting or killing suspected members. The Bush administration and coalition leaders began to publicly state that Iran was supplying weapons, particularly EFP devices, to Iraqi insurgents and militias although to date have failed to provide any proof for these allegations.
Further sanctions on Iranian organizations were also announced by the Bush administration in the autumn of 2007.
On November 21, 2007, Lieutenant General James Dubik, who is in charge of training Iraqi security forces, praised Iran for its “contribution to the reduction of violence” in Iraq by upholding its pledge to stop the flow of weapons, explosives and training of extremists in Iraq.
The Bush Administration’s rationale for the Iraq War has faced heavy criticism from an array of popular and official sources both inside and outside the United States, with many U.S. citizens finding many parallels with the Vietnam War. For example, the Center for Public Integrity alleges that the Bush administration made a total of 935 false statements between 2001 and 2003 about Iraq’s alleged threat to the United States.
Another criticism of the initial intelligence leading up to the Iraq war comes from a former CIA officer who described the Office of Special Plans as a group of ideologues who were dangerous to U.S. national security and a threat to world peace, and that the group lied and manipulated intelligence to further its agenda of removing Saddam. Subsequently, in 2008, the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity, a group partially funded by George Soros has enumerated a total of 935 allegedly false statements made by George W. Bush and six other top members of his administration in what it termed a “carefully launched campaign of misinformation” during the two year period following 9/11 attacks, in order to rally support for the invasion of Iraq.
To make matters clear you only need to look at the surnames of most people behind the media, of all sizes, and corporations in the US, and you will find out that they are mostly composed of Zionist families that run away from Europe and migrated to the US during the first and second World War.
The Zionists tried to do the same thing they do today in the US, in Vienna, back then, and yes, they did manage to wreck both, one with war, and the other, America, the wreckage we see today, the propaganda and finance circus, to get Israel, the promised land, the Zionist ultimate goal, back.
They now wrecked their very own Holy Land.
Obviously, not all Jewish people are Zionists, there are lots of liberal Jews, and specially the young are not generally happy about the way that group do things, at all, see recent unrests in Israel.
Just like the US, they also adopt a xenophobic view against foreign countries, specially its neighbours, and spend trillions in defense while depriving its own people of basic goods.
Principle, as learned from Vienna early last century, is simple.
The Zionists get to control most of the national media, exceptions treated as radical and anti-Semite and/or communist, dress it as a truly national media (as of the country they are in), raise a sense of proudness in the country’s citizens as “this is the best the country has, this is us”, while it is not, it is purely and merely conveniently to the own goals, artificial, and often serve interests that shall be considered opposed to national interests. It is a sleazy way to penetrate the country and get the country to co-operate and fund their own goals, with cemented foundations, for as long as it takes, wrecking it in the process.
Like a leech. More specifically, a Chosen Leech with a mission.
A classic example in politics is Michelle Bachmann, a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Minnesota’s 6th congressional districtto, to which the Zephyr Global Report defines as
WASP-Hebraic, Zionist Fanatic, IRS Attorney, Liar, War Mongerer, Fake Christian.
She despises Americans and has contempt for all Americans as a sleazy, lying IRS attorney, and thinks she can lie her way to power like Bush and Reagan and Obama.
She serves the Crown of England, aka Zion, and the Apartheid murderous state of Israel, our 911 thorn, indeed the thorn in the side of the peace-loving gentile world.
While she may not be strictly speaking a Hebrew she is the first cousin of the Hebrew as a WASP ,and married to a ‘gay Hebrew , or rather ‘reformed’ or ex-gay (we hope) Hebrew. Now let me say I respect her reformed homosexual hebrew husband going straight, I just don’t want a lying sleazy, WASP, Zionist with a lispy, limped wrist Crypto Hebrew husband in the Whitehouse who is a Zionist. She is a more refined WASP version of the evil WASP Sarah Heath, aka Palin. Although Palin is technically an Engbrew.
This would be kind of like having Barbara Streisand in the Whitehouse only one with her finger on the Nuclear end-the-world trigger.
From southern France, Christopher Jones summarizes and comments on a report on the assassination of President Kennedy. Need I stress that WAIS censors only direct attacks on other WAISers and grossly improper language.
Christopher says: “I glanced at the Kennedy assassination site and found this; it fits into our discussion of Hollywood stereotypes and the slavish behavior of the US press after the 9/11 tragedy and in the run up to the invasion of Iraq. In a quick rundown, the website recapitulates an old story that I heard back in the late sixties and early seventies in California: that Kennedy was liquidated by the mafia whose kingpin was Meyer Lansky (pal of Lucky Luciano). In fact, I could add a small tidbit which the author may or may not have covered: that Marilyn Monroe was murdered by the mafia as a warning to her lovers; Bobby and Jack Kennedy. The story of the Corsican hit squad was documented in a TV documentary in Europe. Of course it would be interesting to know more about Auguste Ricord and his collaboration with the Gestapo and if he had anything to do with our old friend, Mandel Szkolnikoff.
“Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals:
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.
Most of the larger independent newspapers are owned by Jewish interests as well. An example is media mogul is Samuel I. “Si” Newhouse, who owns two dozen daily newspapers from Staten Island to Oregon, plus the Sunday supplement Parade; the Conde Nast collection of magazines, including Vogue, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, Allure, GQ, and Self; the publishing firms of Random House, Knopf, Crown, and Ballantine, among other imprints; and cable franchises with over one million subscribers.”
I could add that Michael Eisner could depart Disney tomorrow but the company will remain in the hands of Shamrock Holdings, whose principal office is now located in Israel”.
Hi Jeff – I am Jewish and I take exception to some of the articles you post on your site. However, this particular article is staggering in its implications. It is said there are less than 15 million Jews on the planet. Most of us…and I know a lot of people… are kind, normal and not megalomaniacal in our approach to life. When someone of ANY religious or political persuasion reads this story and then also factors in the dominance of Jews in finance and the economy, government, science, the medical profession, the legal profession – in fact all the professions – one has to come away pondering how such staggering influence has been acquired by such a microscopic percent of the world’s 7 BILLION people. For ANY group to wield such power clearly and obviously injects profound bias and skewing into all areas of a nation so dominated. Is there a Zionist/Jewish bias in Western society and especially the US? Is grass green? It is often whispered that Baron Rothschild really owns and controls Great Britain. It is reported that 7 of the 8 oligarch/gangsters who control most of Russia are Jews …probably hard core Zionists. (Maybe Putin is trying to prevent a total Zionist takeover of Russia with the Lukos oil magnate’s arrest?) And then look at the Zionist Jewish near domination of the Bush administration (no coincidence, that) and the more than one trillion dollars the kindly American people have given to Israel in ‘loan guarantees’…not a penny of which has ever…or will ever… be paid back. I could go on but it when a Jew starts to point out the facts and connect the dots, they are quickly smeared as ‘self-hating’ and so forth. Well, this Jew is an American first and I’m hoping you continue to post factual articles like this on your site. Thank you.
Shalom
Bottom point is that the media totally shapes the American’s public opinion, so as long as it transvestites itself as all-American, people do not really realize what is going on, specially the fact that most if not all of that propaganda and policies resulting of such are actually anti, not pro America.
On October 3, 2001, I.A.P. News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael an acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres.
Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and “turn the US against us. “Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying “don’t worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America.”
“The Israelis control the policy in the congress and the senate.”
